Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and active role in entire modus operandi of wrong availment of cenvat credit by the manufacturer - Therefore, the penalties imposed on the appellant is correct hence, the same is upheld. - AT
Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and active role in entire modus operandi of wrong availment of cenvat credit by the manufacturer - Therefore, the penalties imposed on the appellant is correct hence, the same is upheld. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
