Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Mis-declared/un-declared imported goods - Evidently, no panchnama was drawn by Revenue for retrieval of data or documents from the CPU/mobile of the appellant - The seizure is bad under the provisions of Section 110 of the Act. It is found that the show cause notice is vague as it does not specify the particular clause of Section 111, under which the goods are liable for confiscation. Further, in the facts and circumstances, the imposition of penalty under Section 112 and 114 AA is bad. - AT
Mis-declared/un-declared imported goods - Evidently, no panchnama was drawn by Revenue for retrieval of data or documents from the CPU/mobile of the appellant - The seizure is bad under the provisions of Section 110 of the Act. It is found that the show cause notice is vague as it does not specify the particular clause of Section 111, under which the goods are liable for confiscation. Further, in the facts and circumstances, the imposition of penalty under Section 112 and 114 AA is bad. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
