Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - we could not made out any evidence of the assessee having explained the issue of 'prior period expenses' before the AO. Therefore, assessment order passed by the AO on the issue of 'prior period expenses' is definitely erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue - Revision order sustained - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - we could not made out any evidence of the assessee having explained the issue of 'prior period expenses' before the AO. Therefore, assessment order passed by the AO on the issue of 'prior period expenses' is definitely erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue - Revision order sustained - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
