Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Levy of penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent passing of cenvat Credit - it is clearly established that the appellant has facilitated by only issuing the invoice without supplying the goods for passing of the fraudulent cenvat credit - Therefore, the appellant was rightly liable for penalty under Rule 26. - AT
Levy of penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent passing of cenvat Credit - it is clearly established that the appellant has facilitated by only issuing the invoice without supplying the goods for passing of the fraudulent cenvat credit - Therefore, the appellant was rightly liable for penalty under Rule 26. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.