Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - treating capital expenditure as revenue expenditure in the absence of any revenue recognition - t the assessee demonstrated that it had acted bonfidely on the basis of guidance notes of the ICAI and on the basis of accounting of such expenses in the earlier years, etc. - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - treating capital expenditure as revenue expenditure in the absence of any revenue recognition - t the assessee demonstrated that it had acted bonfidely on the basis of guidance notes of the ICAI and on the basis of accounting of such expenses in the earlier years, etc. - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.