Exemption for non-air-conditioned restaurant services survives where the establishment's air-conditioned section is separately identifiable and taxabl...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure to re-invest the capital gains for the purpose of claiming Section 54 deduction - DR could hardly rebut the clinching settled legal preposition that quantum and penalty are parallel proceedings wherein each and every disallowance/addition made in course of the former does not ipso facto attract to penal mechanism - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure to re-invest the capital gains for the purpose of claiming Section 54 deduction - DR could hardly rebut the clinching settled legal preposition that quantum and penalty are parallel proceedings wherein each and every disallowance/addition made in course of the former does not ipso facto attract to penal mechanism - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.