Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure to re-invest the capital gains for the purpose of claiming Section 54 deduction - DR could hardly rebut the clinching settled legal preposition that quantum and penalty are parallel proceedings wherein each and every disallowance/addition made in course of the former does not ipso facto attract to penal mechanism - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure to re-invest the capital gains for the purpose of claiming Section 54 deduction - DR could hardly rebut the clinching settled legal preposition that quantum and penalty are parallel proceedings wherein each and every disallowance/addition made in course of the former does not ipso facto attract to penal mechanism - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.