Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure to re-invest the capital gains for the purpose of claiming Section 54 deduction - DR could hardly rebut the clinching settled legal preposition that quantum and penalty are parallel proceedings wherein each and every disallowance/addition made in course of the former does not ipso facto attract to penal mechanism - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure to re-invest the capital gains for the purpose of claiming Section 54 deduction - DR could hardly rebut the clinching settled legal preposition that quantum and penalty are parallel proceedings wherein each and every disallowance/addition made in course of the former does not ipso facto attract to penal mechanism - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.