Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
TDS u/s 194C - payment to works contract - MoU reveals that the work carried out by the developer / contractor was as per the requirements of the assessee - Demand confirmed - On alternative argument, purchase of immovable property, by an assessee from a developer, was otherwise for TDS at 1%. We therefore agree CIT(A) that the assessee was liable to deduct TDS. Assessee therefore cannot be exonerated from the charge of being ‘assessee in default’.- AT
TDS u/s 194C - payment to works contract - MoU reveals that the work carried out by the developer / contractor was as per the requirements of the assessee - Demand confirmed - On alternative argument, purchase of immovable property, by an assessee from a developer, was otherwise for TDS at 1%. We therefore agree CIT(A) that the assessee was liable to deduct TDS. Assessee therefore cannot be exonerated from the charge of being ‘assessee in default’.- AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
