Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Refusal to appoint an arbitrator and refer the dispute to the arbitrator - The dispute is with respect to the Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement which is altogether different from the allegations of mismanagement and oppression at the instance of minority shareholder initiated by the respondent. - The High Court has erred in dismissing the application u/s 11(6) of the Act, 1996 and has erred in refusing to appoint an arbitrator - SC
Refusal to appoint an arbitrator and refer the dispute to the arbitrator - The dispute is with respect to the Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement which is altogether different from the allegations of mismanagement and oppression at the instance of minority shareholder initiated by the respondent. - The High Court has erred in dismissing the application u/s 11(6) of the Act, 1996 and has erred in refusing to appoint an arbitrator - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
