Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Validity of detention order - malice in law - COFEPOSA - Inordinate and unexplained delay in passing of the impugned detention order - the detention order cannot be quashed on the ground urged on behalf of the detenu that there was inordinate and unexplained delay on the part of the Central Government, i.e., respondent no. 3 in deciding the representation dated 10.03.2022. - HC
Validity of detention order - malice in law - COFEPOSA - Inordinate and unexplained delay in passing of the impugned detention order - the detention order cannot be quashed on the ground urged on behalf of the detenu that there was inordinate and unexplained delay on the part of the Central Government, i.e., respondent no. 3 in deciding the representation dated 10.03.2022. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
