Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Scope of advance ruling - AAR obtained the ruling by fraud or suppression of facts - misdeclaration of facts - search proceedings were initiated - appellant was also issued with GST DRC-01A - It was encumbent upon the appellant while making application for Advance Ruling, to have declared the true and complete facts, given the provisions of the GST law, in particular Sections 98(2) and 104 of the CGST Act, 2017. - The invocation of Section 104 of CGST Act by the GAAR and declaring advance ruling dated 20.01.2021 void ab initio is legal - AAAR
Scope of advance ruling - AAR obtained the ruling by fraud or suppression of facts - misdeclaration of facts - search proceedings were initiated - appellant was also issued with GST DRC-01A - It was encumbent upon the appellant while making application for Advance Ruling, to have declared the true and complete facts, given the provisions of the GST law, in particular Sections 98(2) and 104 of the CGST Act, 2017. - The invocation of Section 104 of CGST Act by the GAAR and declaring advance ruling dated 20.01.2021 void ab initio is legal - AAAR
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.