Preliminary reassessment proceedings generally require statutory remedies unless jurisdiction is wholly absent or mandatory conditions are patently br...
Agricultural land classification requires cumulative factual indicators, while industrial-purpose land and absent agricultural use defeat reinvestment...
Rejection of refund of penalty deposited - applicability of principles of unjust enrichment - the provisions of unjust enrichment are not attracted as the burden of penalty is borne by the appellant and has not been passed on to their service receivers. Moreover, it is found that the refund arising pursuant to being successful in appeal, is available to an assessee under the provisions of Section 35 FF of the Central Excise Act. - AT
Rejection of refund of penalty deposited - applicability of principles of unjust enrichment - the provisions of unjust enrichment are not attracted as the burden of penalty is borne by the appellant and has not been passed on to their service receivers. Moreover, it is found that the refund arising pursuant to being successful in appeal, is available to an assessee under the provisions of Section 35 FF of the Central Excise Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
