Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - TP Adjustment - it is a debatable issue whether reimbursement of expenses qualifies as FTS and there are various decisions which have held that reimbursement of expenses does not qualify as FTS. Accordingly, we are of the considered view that no penalty can be levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act on account of treating reimbursement of expenses as FTS. - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - TP Adjustment - it is a debatable issue whether reimbursement of expenses qualifies as FTS and there are various decisions which have held that reimbursement of expenses does not qualify as FTS. Accordingly, we are of the considered view that no penalty can be levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act on account of treating reimbursement of expenses as FTS. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
