Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction of expenditure from income taxable under the head "From Other Sources" - Car Lease rental income - A plain reading of section 57 (iii) of the Act would lead one to the conclusion that it does not say that the expenditure shall be deductible only if any net positive income is made or earned. Therefore, there can even be a negative income/loss u/s. 57(iii) of the Act. Therefore, by this reasoning also, CIT(A) was incorrect in directing that the amount of deduction should be restricted to the income earned. - AT
Deduction of expenditure from income taxable under the head "From Other Sources" - Car Lease rental income - A plain reading of section 57 (iii) of the Act would lead one to the conclusion that it does not say that the expenditure shall be deductible only if any net positive income is made or earned. Therefore, there can even be a negative income/loss u/s. 57(iii) of the Act. Therefore, by this reasoning also, CIT(A) was incorrect in directing that the amount of deduction should be restricted to the income earned. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.