Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment u/s 153A/153C - The three conditions operate on a stand-alone basis, separated by the conjunction 'or', and not concurrently and the satisfaction or otherwise of any one of the three conditions would suffice to decide the question of jurisdiction. - In the case of the petitioner the return has been filed on 26.09.2018 u/s 139(4), and is thus a valid return. Notice under Section 143(2) has been issued on 27.08.2019, also within time. Condition (b) is thus not satisfied and no proceedings may be initiated u/s 153C. - HC
Assessment u/s 153A/153C - The three conditions operate on a stand-alone basis, separated by the conjunction 'or', and not concurrently and the satisfaction or otherwise of any one of the three conditions would suffice to decide the question of jurisdiction. - In the case of the petitioner the return has been filed on 26.09.2018 u/s 139(4), and is thus a valid return. Notice under Section 143(2) has been issued on 27.08.2019, also within time. Condition (b) is thus not satisfied and no proceedings may be initiated u/s 153C. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.