Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Insolvency and BankruptcyOctober 15, 2022Case LawsAT
Fraudulent Trading/Wrongful Trading - The stand taken by the respective parties, comes to a Resultant Conclusion that the Transfer of Assets among the Group Companies ex-facie is not a Fraudulent Trading, as per Section 66 (1) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. - the Plea of Fraudulent Trading as projected by the Appellant / Applicant is not proved, to the subjective satisfaction of this Tribunal, in a convincing manner. - AT
Fraudulent Trading/Wrongful Trading - The stand taken by the respective parties, comes to a Resultant Conclusion that the Transfer of Assets among the Group Companies ex-facie is not a Fraudulent Trading, as per Section 66 (1) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. - the Plea of Fraudulent Trading as projected by the Appellant / Applicant is not proved, to the subjective satisfaction of this Tribunal, in a convincing manner. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
