Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Insolvency and BankruptcyOctober 13, 2022Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor although once appeared before the Adjudicating Authority but neither filed any reply nor appeared thereafter and Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte against the Corporate Debtor. - In this appeal also despite service of notice, Corporate Debtor did not appear. There is not even dispute to allegations and case set up by the Financial Creditor against the Corporate Debtor. - The Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting Section 7 application - AT
Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor although once appeared before the Adjudicating Authority but neither filed any reply nor appeared thereafter and Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte against the Corporate Debtor. - In this appeal also despite service of notice, Corporate Debtor did not appear. There is not even dispute to allegations and case set up by the Financial Creditor against the Corporate Debtor. - The Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting Section 7 application - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
