Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyOctober 13, 2022Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor although once appeared before the Adjudicating Authority but neither filed any reply nor appeared thereafter and Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte against the Corporate Debtor. - In this appeal also despite service of notice, Corporate Debtor did not appear. There is not even dispute to allegations and case set up by the Financial Creditor against the Corporate Debtor. - The Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting Section 7 application - AT
Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor although once appeared before the Adjudicating Authority but neither filed any reply nor appeared thereafter and Adjudicating Authority proceeded ex-parte against the Corporate Debtor. - In this appeal also despite service of notice, Corporate Debtor did not appear. There is not even dispute to allegations and case set up by the Financial Creditor against the Corporate Debtor. - The Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting Section 7 application - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
