Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by granting adjournment by the AO himself. - the assessment was framed u/s 143(3) - the penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act cannot be imposed on the assessee for such bonafide default due to reasons beyond his control - AT
Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by granting adjournment by the AO himself. - the assessment was framed u/s 143(3) - the penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act cannot be imposed on the assessee for such bonafide default due to reasons beyond his control - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
