Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by granting adjournment by the AO himself. - the assessment was framed u/s 143(3) - the penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act cannot be imposed on the assessee for such bonafide default due to reasons beyond his control - AT
Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by granting adjournment by the AO himself. - the assessment was framed u/s 143(3) - the penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act cannot be imposed on the assessee for such bonafide default due to reasons beyond his control - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
