Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty u/s 271D - contravention of provisions of 269SS - Scope of 'reasonable cause' used in Section 273B - Even though transactions of one party had been settled by the other party by way of assignment of receivables / payables or for any other reason as detailed supra, we find that all the transactions have been ultimately settled for the difference amount by account payee cheques only. - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 271D - contravention of provisions of 269SS - Scope of 'reasonable cause' used in Section 273B - Even though transactions of one party had been settled by the other party by way of assignment of receivables / payables or for any other reason as detailed supra, we find that all the transactions have been ultimately settled for the difference amount by account payee cheques only. - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
