Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - profit attribution of a fixed place PE and the DAPE - Erroneous but not prejudicial to revenue order - Even if that computation of profit attribution, on the basis of the two taxpayer approach, is erroneous, in view of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court decision, it cannot be said to be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue unless there is a categorical finding that the payment to the dependent agent is not an arm’s length price vis-à-vis functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed by the dependent agent. - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - profit attribution of a fixed place PE and the DAPE - Erroneous but not prejudicial to revenue order - Even if that computation of profit attribution, on the basis of the two taxpayer approach, is erroneous, in view of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court decision, it cannot be said to be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue unless there is a categorical finding that the payment to the dependent agent is not an arm’s length price vis-à-vis functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed by the dependent agent. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
