Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - profit attribution of a fixed place PE and the DAPE - Erroneous but not prejudicial to revenue order - Even if that computation of profit attribution, on the basis of the two taxpayer approach, is erroneous, in view of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court decision, it cannot be said to be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue unless there is a categorical finding that the payment to the dependent agent is not an arm’s length price vis-à-vis functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed by the dependent agent. - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - profit attribution of a fixed place PE and the DAPE - Erroneous but not prejudicial to revenue order - Even if that computation of profit attribution, on the basis of the two taxpayer approach, is erroneous, in view of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court decision, it cannot be said to be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue unless there is a categorical finding that the payment to the dependent agent is not an arm’s length price vis-à-vis functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed by the dependent agent. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
