Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance being 10% of expenditure - Disallowance of expenditure @ 10% of the expenditure in the instant case appears to be on the higher side since it gives a profit rate of 37.78% which is not possible in the line of business. Considering the fact that the assessee has already declared profit rate of 9.29%, the disallowance on lumpsum basis in the instant case, in our opinion, meet the ends of justice. - AT
Disallowance being 10% of expenditure - Disallowance of expenditure @ 10% of the expenditure in the instant case appears to be on the higher side since it gives a profit rate of 37.78% which is not possible in the line of business. Considering the fact that the assessee has already declared profit rate of 9.29%, the disallowance on lumpsum basis in the instant case, in our opinion, meet the ends of justice. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.