Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - AO was not authorized to carry out enquiry beyond the scope of the reasons for which the case was selected under limited scrutiny and therefore the Ld. CIT is not justified in directing the Assessing Officer to carry out the enquiry on the issues other than the issues for which case was selected for limited scrutiny and holding the order as erroneous insofar prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - AO was not authorized to carry out enquiry beyond the scope of the reasons for which the case was selected under limited scrutiny and therefore the Ld. CIT is not justified in directing the Assessing Officer to carry out the enquiry on the issues other than the issues for which case was selected for limited scrutiny and holding the order as erroneous insofar prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.