Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption from service tax provided to DMRC - Railways - composite contacts - works contract service - The exclusion of the alleged ‘taxable service’ sought to be fastened on them from any contract other than service simpliciter erases the distinction of commercial outcome suggested by the reviewing authority. In any case, even if Delhi Metro Rail Corporation were to be the final recipient of the service rendered by the respondent, the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in M/s Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. categorising them as ‘railway’ forecloses taxability even if the dispute pertains to laying of water pipelines. - AT
Exemption from service tax provided to DMRC - Railways - composite contacts - works contract service - The exclusion of the alleged ‘taxable service’ sought to be fastened on them from any contract other than service simpliciter erases the distinction of commercial outcome suggested by the reviewing authority. In any case, even if Delhi Metro Rail Corporation were to be the final recipient of the service rendered by the respondent, the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in M/s Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. categorising them as ‘railway’ forecloses taxability even if the dispute pertains to laying of water pipelines. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
