Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Exemption from service tax provided to DMRC - Railways - composite contacts - works contract service - The exclusion of the alleged ‘taxable service’ sought to be fastened on them from any contract other than service simpliciter erases the distinction of commercial outcome suggested by the reviewing authority. In any case, even if Delhi Metro Rail Corporation were to be the final recipient of the service rendered by the respondent, the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in M/s Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. categorising them as ‘railway’ forecloses taxability even if the dispute pertains to laying of water pipelines. - AT
Exemption from service tax provided to DMRC - Railways - composite contacts - works contract service - The exclusion of the alleged ‘taxable service’ sought to be fastened on them from any contract other than service simpliciter erases the distinction of commercial outcome suggested by the reviewing authority. In any case, even if Delhi Metro Rail Corporation were to be the final recipient of the service rendered by the respondent, the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in M/s Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. categorising them as ‘railway’ forecloses taxability even if the dispute pertains to laying of water pipelines. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
