Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Ex-party order - Validity of rejection of appeal by the CESTAT - Assessee / Petitioner could not appear due to non-receipt of notice - The Petitioner is not a small individual trader who is operating out of a premises that is not locatable. The Petitioner is the “Delhi International Airport Limited” (DIAL) whose addresses and contact details in addition to being available online, could have easily been ascertained by the CESTAT. - HC
Ex-party order - Validity of rejection of appeal by the CESTAT - Assessee / Petitioner could not appear due to non-receipt of notice - The Petitioner is not a small individual trader who is operating out of a premises that is not locatable. The Petitioner is the “Delhi International Airport Limited” (DIAL) whose addresses and contact details in addition to being available online, could have easily been ascertained by the CESTAT. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
