Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - genuineness of purchases - Assessee statedly had made purchases from the three parties - Payments made through banking channels - Assessee in our view has discharged his onus in respect of the subject purchases. AO has also not doubted the sales arising out of the said export activity and its GPR. This is not a case which falls within the ambit of Section 69C as held by the AO. - HC
Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - genuineness of purchases - Assessee statedly had made purchases from the three parties - Payments made through banking channels - Assessee in our view has discharged his onus in respect of the subject purchases. AO has also not doubted the sales arising out of the said export activity and its GPR. This is not a case which falls within the ambit of Section 69C as held by the AO. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
