Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - genuineness of purchases - Assessee statedly had made purchases from the three parties - Payments made through banking channels - Assessee in our view has discharged his onus in respect of the subject purchases. AO has also not doubted the sales arising out of the said export activity and its GPR. This is not a case which falls within the ambit of Section 69C as held by the AO. - HC
Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - genuineness of purchases - Assessee statedly had made purchases from the three parties - Payments made through banking channels - Assessee in our view has discharged his onus in respect of the subject purchases. AO has also not doubted the sales arising out of the said export activity and its GPR. This is not a case which falls within the ambit of Section 69C as held by the AO. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
