Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Profiteering - purchase of a Flat - since there was no reduction in the rate of tax nor there was increased additional benefit on account of ETC. Hence, the provisions of Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 are not liable to be invoked in this case - case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions - NAPA
Profiteering - purchase of a Flat - since there was no reduction in the rate of tax nor there was increased additional benefit on account of ETC. Hence, the provisions of Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 are not liable to be invoked in this case - case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.