Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO jurisdiction in issuing notice - Once the territorial jurisdiction of respondent no.1 is admitted by the petitioner, there existed no occasion for the Assessing Officer to refer the matter for determination under sub-section (2) of Section 124 before the assessment was made. - Merely because some pecuniary limit has been fixed for purpose of distribution of work between officers, it would not mean that there shall be inherent lack of jurisdiction of AO - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO jurisdiction in issuing notice - Once the territorial jurisdiction of respondent no.1 is admitted by the petitioner, there existed no occasion for the Assessing Officer to refer the matter for determination under sub-section (2) of Section 124 before the assessment was made. - Merely because some pecuniary limit has been fixed for purpose of distribution of work between officers, it would not mean that there shall be inherent lack of jurisdiction of AO - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.