Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act - respondents categorically stated that only the corrigendum was served on them without the show cause notice - Penalty could not have been imposed upon the two respondents if opportunity was not provided to the two respondents to file a reply to the show cause notice. This apart, the show cause notice also does not contain any allegation against the two respondents. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act - respondents categorically stated that only the corrigendum was served on them without the show cause notice - Penalty could not have been imposed upon the two respondents if opportunity was not provided to the two respondents to file a reply to the show cause notice. This apart, the show cause notice also does not contain any allegation against the two respondents. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
