Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act - respondents categorically stated that only the corrigendum was served on them without the show cause notice - Penalty could not have been imposed upon the two respondents if opportunity was not provided to the two respondents to file a reply to the show cause notice. This apart, the show cause notice also does not contain any allegation against the two respondents. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act - respondents categorically stated that only the corrigendum was served on them without the show cause notice - Penalty could not have been imposed upon the two respondents if opportunity was not provided to the two respondents to file a reply to the show cause notice. This apart, the show cause notice also does not contain any allegation against the two respondents. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
