Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act - respondents categorically stated that only the corrigendum was served on them without the show cause notice - Penalty could not have been imposed upon the two respondents if opportunity was not provided to the two respondents to file a reply to the show cause notice. This apart, the show cause notice also does not contain any allegation against the two respondents. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act - respondents categorically stated that only the corrigendum was served on them without the show cause notice - Penalty could not have been imposed upon the two respondents if opportunity was not provided to the two respondents to file a reply to the show cause notice. This apart, the show cause notice also does not contain any allegation against the two respondents. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
