Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - re-assessment proceedings have been initiated beyond a period of four years - there has been full disclosure by the assessee in relation to the issues flagged in the reasons for re-assessment and the Department has not in this case discharged the statutory burden as set out in the proviso to Section 147. The impugned proceedings are held to be barred by limitation and the impugned orders are quashed. - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - re-assessment proceedings have been initiated beyond a period of four years - there has been full disclosure by the assessee in relation to the issues flagged in the reasons for re-assessment and the Department has not in this case discharged the statutory burden as set out in the proviso to Section 147. The impugned proceedings are held to be barred by limitation and the impugned orders are quashed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.