Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Claim made by the assessee u/s. 32AC in respect of investment made in the new plant & machinery - In assessee’s case while interpreting the wordings “acquires and installs” in section 32AC, the AO has taken one view in allowing the deduction based on the submissions of the assessee of various judicial pronouncements rendered in the context of 32(1)(iia); whereas the CIT is not in agreement with the view based on the plain reading of section 32AC. - the CIT is not justified in setting aside the order of the AO - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Claim made by the assessee u/s. 32AC in respect of investment made in the new plant & machinery - In assessee’s case while interpreting the wordings “acquires and installs” in section 32AC, the AO has taken one view in allowing the deduction based on the submissions of the assessee of various judicial pronouncements rendered in the context of 32(1)(iia); whereas the CIT is not in agreement with the view based on the plain reading of section 32AC. - the CIT is not justified in setting aside the order of the AO - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.