Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Claim made by the assessee u/s. 32AC in respect of investment made in the new plant & machinery - In assessee’s case while interpreting the wordings “acquires and installs” in section 32AC, the AO has taken one view in allowing the deduction based on the submissions of the assessee of various judicial pronouncements rendered in the context of 32(1)(iia); whereas the CIT is not in agreement with the view based on the plain reading of section 32AC. - the CIT is not justified in setting aside the order of the AO - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Claim made by the assessee u/s. 32AC in respect of investment made in the new plant & machinery - In assessee’s case while interpreting the wordings “acquires and installs” in section 32AC, the AO has taken one view in allowing the deduction based on the submissions of the assessee of various judicial pronouncements rendered in the context of 32(1)(iia); whereas the CIT is not in agreement with the view based on the plain reading of section 32AC. - the CIT is not justified in setting aside the order of the AO - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
