Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 23, 2022Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Financial Debt or not - It is clear that the amount provided by PEC as financial assistance, and claimed by it as financial debt under IBC, is basically for purchase, shipment and export of iron ore fines in fulfilment of the foreign contract. This amount is certainly not an amount given by PEC Ltd. as a financial creditor to a corporate entity M/s Phulchand Exports to ensure its overall financial viability. - The amount as claimed by the Appellant does not fall in the category of ‘financial debt’ as defined in the IBC - the Adjudicating Authority has not erred in passing the Impugned Order, whereby the Section 7 application of the Appellant has been dismissed. - AT
Initiation of CIRP - Financial Debt or not - It is clear that the amount provided by PEC as financial assistance, and claimed by it as financial debt under IBC, is basically for purchase, shipment and export of iron ore fines in fulfilment of the foreign contract. This amount is certainly not an amount given by PEC Ltd. as a financial creditor to a corporate entity M/s Phulchand Exports to ensure its overall financial viability. - The amount as claimed by the Appellant does not fall in the category of ‘financial debt’ as defined in the IBC - the Adjudicating Authority has not erred in passing the Impugned Order, whereby the Section 7 application of the Appellant has been dismissed. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
