Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
CENVAT Credit - input services - services of Commission Agent received for marketing of products / sale of goods - The learned Commissioner has correctly held that the impugned service does not qualify as Input Service as the same was not used in or in relation to manufacture of goods by the appellants and therefore, the credit availed is illegal. - penalty under Rule 15 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 is rightly imposed. - AT
CENVAT Credit - input services - services of Commission Agent received for marketing of products / sale of goods - The learned Commissioner has correctly held that the impugned service does not qualify as Input Service as the same was not used in or in relation to manufacture of goods by the appellants and therefore, the credit availed is illegal. - penalty under Rule 15 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 is rightly imposed. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.