Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Disallowance of credit for TDS - Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - As per order u/s 154 dated: 10.08.2018, the tax deductor of the appellant has withdrawn certain tax credits as per Rule 37BA. - Assessee filed her return of income on the basis of record generated by department itself i.e., form no 26AS and form no 16A. The documents which has been processed and issued by the department itself on which assessee relied, how there can be a case of mistake apparent from record. May be there is a mismatch in the data pertaining to assessee and data pertaining to deductor (processed and maintained by department), CPC Bangalore and jurisdictional ITO can’t proceed u/s 154 against the assessee. - - AT
Disallowance of credit for TDS - Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - As per order u/s 154 dated: 10.08.2018, the tax deductor of the appellant has withdrawn certain tax credits as per Rule 37BA. - Assessee filed her return of income on the basis of record generated by department itself i.e., form no 26AS and form no 16A. The documents which has been processed and issued by the department itself on which assessee relied, how there can be a case of mistake apparent from record. May be there is a mismatch in the data pertaining to assessee and data pertaining to deductor (processed and maintained by department), CPC Bangalore and jurisdictional ITO can’t proceed u/s 154 against the assessee. - - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
