Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural just...
Oppression and mismanagement - issuance of 30,000 equity shares by private placements - From the facts of this case, it is clear that Respondent nos. 2 and 3 had allotted shares of Respondent no. 1 Company to either their relatives, or the Companies indirectly controlled by them. This was done without disclosing the full facts - it is a fit case to exercise powers conferred on this Tribunal under sections 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956, or for that matter, under section 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013. - Tri
Oppression and mismanagement - issuance of 30,000 equity shares by private placements - From the facts of this case, it is clear that Respondent nos. 2 and 3 had allotted shares of Respondent no. 1 Company to either their relatives, or the Companies indirectly controlled by them. This was done without disclosing the full facts - it is a fit case to exercise powers conferred on this Tribunal under sections 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956, or for that matter, under section 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013. - Tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
