Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - accepting deposits by way of journal entries - assessee had accepted/paid loans in contravention of provision of section 269SS/269T - the Hon’ble Bombay High Court has specifically observed that irrespective whether the transaction was bonafide or non-bonafide, repayment of loan by debiting amount through journal entries was in the nature of contravention of section 269T. - Levy of penalty confirmed - AT
Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - accepting deposits by way of journal entries - assessee had accepted/paid loans in contravention of provision of section 269SS/269T - the Hon’ble Bombay High Court has specifically observed that irrespective whether the transaction was bonafide or non-bonafide, repayment of loan by debiting amount through journal entries was in the nature of contravention of section 269T. - Levy of penalty confirmed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
