Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Refund of service tax paid - tax paid under the head Management Consultant’s Service on reverse charge mechanism - M/s Cotunace have not rendered any advice for running the organisation of the appellants in an effective manner. Their role was mediation /arbitration in resolving the dispute. They have only performed the work of mediator/arbitrator in resolving the dispute between the appellant and M/s GCT. Actual work performed cannot be equated with advice. Therefore, M/s Cotunace did not render any management consultancy service to the appellant. - RCM is not applicable - Refund allowed - AT
Refund of service tax paid - tax paid under the head Management Consultant’s Service on reverse charge mechanism - M/s Cotunace have not rendered any advice for running the organisation of the appellants in an effective manner. Their role was mediation /arbitration in resolving the dispute. They have only performed the work of mediator/arbitrator in resolving the dispute between the appellant and M/s GCT. Actual work performed cannot be equated with advice. Therefore, M/s Cotunace did not render any management consultancy service to the appellant. - RCM is not applicable - Refund allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
