Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 8, 2022Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - It is the case of the Appellant that the date of default of Non-Performing Assets (NPA) on 05.07.2014 and the Bank/ R2 has filed petition under Section 7 of the Code on 11.12.2019 - NCLT admitted the application - This case finally reflects that this is a forum shopping being done by a private sector bank which is not healthy. - CIRP mechanism is not for a debt recovery as Hon’ble Supreme Court has already settled the law on this aspect. Hence, CIRP cannot be used for bringing a Corporate Debtor to liquidation & thereby enriching Private Sector Bank. - AT
Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - It is the case of the Appellant that the date of default of Non-Performing Assets (NPA) on 05.07.2014 and the Bank/ R2 has filed petition under Section 7 of the Code on 11.12.2019 - NCLT admitted the application - This case finally reflects that this is a forum shopping being done by a private sector bank which is not healthy. - CIRP mechanism is not for a debt recovery as Hon’ble Supreme Court has already settled the law on this aspect. Hence, CIRP cannot be used for bringing a Corporate Debtor to liquidation & thereby enriching Private Sector Bank. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
