Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Capital gain computation - sale of shares - full value of consideration - deduction of expenses u/s 48 - The appellant had agreed to pay the tax component as per Clause 7(1) of the share purchase agreement. - A careful perusal of the agreement shows that intention of the parties is clear to the effect that the value of the shares shall be the amount agreed between the parties excluding the tax component. However, the contention urged by Shri Aravind that tax component should be distributed among both sellers merits consideration. Therefore, appellant shall be entitled for deduction of only 50% of the tax component proportionate to her share holding. - HC
Capital gain computation - sale of shares - full value of consideration - deduction of expenses u/s 48 - The appellant had agreed to pay the tax component as per Clause 7(1) of the share purchase agreement. - A careful perusal of the agreement shows that intention of the parties is clear to the effect that the value of the shares shall be the amount agreed between the parties excluding the tax component. However, the contention urged by Shri Aravind that tax component should be distributed among both sellers merits consideration. Therefore, appellant shall be entitled for deduction of only 50% of the tax component proportionate to her share holding. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
