Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Taxability of the remuneration received from the partnership firm and interest on capital contribution made by the partner of the firm in the absence of any business income in the hands of the firm - The reasoning of the CIT(A) that there was no disallowance made by the Assessing Officer u/s.40B and, therefore, the question of applicability of proviso does not arise, in our considered opinion, is unreasonable. The question of disallowance by the Assessing Officer arises only in the event of claim for allowance by the firm. When there was no claim made by the assessee firm u/s. 40B, the question of disallowance does not arise. - AT
Taxability of the remuneration received from the partnership firm and interest on capital contribution made by the partner of the firm in the absence of any business income in the hands of the firm - The reasoning of the CIT(A) that there was no disallowance made by the Assessing Officer u/s.40B and, therefore, the question of applicability of proviso does not arise, in our considered opinion, is unreasonable. The question of disallowance by the Assessing Officer arises only in the event of claim for allowance by the firm. When there was no claim made by the assessee firm u/s. 40B, the question of disallowance does not arise. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.