Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interstate sale or Stock transfer - Merely because quantities of camphor may have been transferred in entirety or soon after receipt at the branch also did not create any presumption of prior contract of sale. Further, the fact that tax may not have been paid by the assessee at Delhi would remain a matter outside the jurisdictional sphere of the taxing authority in the State of U.P. Non payment of tax in one State does not create liability to pay tax in another State. In any case, in the context of inter-State sale, existence of prior contract of sale was mandatory as may have occasioned the movement of goods from UP to Delhi was necessary to be established. - HC
Interstate sale or Stock transfer - Merely because quantities of camphor may have been transferred in entirety or soon after receipt at the branch also did not create any presumption of prior contract of sale. Further, the fact that tax may not have been paid by the assessee at Delhi would remain a matter outside the jurisdictional sphere of the taxing authority in the State of U.P. Non payment of tax in one State does not create liability to pay tax in another State. In any case, in the context of inter-State sale, existence of prior contract of sale was mandatory as may have occasioned the movement of goods from UP to Delhi was necessary to be established. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.