Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJuly 27, 2022Case LawsTri
Validity of order of CIRP obtained - allegation of fraud on the part of Financial Creditor (FC) - The entire transaction as narrated in the Section 7 application is plainly imaginary, concocted and fraudulent. The CD does not appear to have had any genuine liability towards the alleged FC and the entire documentation has evidently been prepared by the alleged FC in collusion with Videocon Group entities. The alleged documents disclosed in the Supplementary Affidavit of the alleged FC, far from helping its case, further demonstrate the fraudulent nature of the documents - CIRP stands vitiated and terminated due to the fraud committed - Cost imposed on FC - Tri
Validity of order of CIRP obtained - allegation of fraud on the part of Financial Creditor (FC) - The entire transaction as narrated in the Section 7 application is plainly imaginary, concocted and fraudulent. The CD does not appear to have had any genuine liability towards the alleged FC and the entire documentation has evidently been prepared by the alleged FC in collusion with Videocon Group entities. The alleged documents disclosed in the Supplementary Affidavit of the alleged FC, far from helping its case, further demonstrate the fraudulent nature of the documents - CIRP stands vitiated and terminated due to the fraud committed - Cost imposed on FC - Tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.